<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Make a &#8220;Disgusting&#8221; Photo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.snapfactory.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931</link>
	<description>News and events from snapfactory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg_Brave</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg_Brave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, &lt;br&gt;Good post, and I understand your position, but I wanted to say something in favor of &quot;Munich&quot; guy - sometimes his position is also a good one. I mean that yes, its a digital camera and shooting hundred more pics doesn&#039;t cost a thing, but from artistic point of view - if you just point and shoot, then just don&#039;t shoot. We see so much photographic crap on the internet, why add more to it?&lt;br&gt;This is why I love so much &lt;a href=&quot;http://1x.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1x.com&lt;/a&gt; and don&#039;t like flickr. I also would like to give credit to that guy for one more thing - he didn&#039;t hesitate to critique you. Here, in the comments I didn&#039;t see a single negative comment. All of them are something like &quot;you are doing a wonderful job!!!&quot;. But how can you learn from such comments? It is much easier to say &quot;your photos are good, great, etc.&quot; and move on, than to say &quot;your photos are not good because this and that&quot;. &lt;br&gt;I always look for that kind of &quot;explained&quot; critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, <br />Good post, and I understand your position, but I wanted to say something in favor of &#8220;Munich&#8221; guy &#8211; sometimes his position is also a good one. I mean that yes, its a digital camera and shooting hundred more pics doesn&#39;t cost a thing, but from artistic point of view &#8211; if you just point and shoot, then just don&#39;t shoot. We see so much photographic crap on the internet, why add more to it?<br />This is why I love so much <a href="http://1x.com" rel="nofollow">1x.com</a> and don&#39;t like flickr. I also would like to give credit to that guy for one more thing &#8211; he didn&#39;t hesitate to critique you. Here, in the comments I didn&#39;t see a single negative comment. All of them are something like &#8220;you are doing a wonderful job!!!&#8221;. But how can you learn from such comments? It is much easier to say &#8220;your photos are good, great, etc.&#8221; and move on, than to say &#8220;your photos are not good because this and that&#8221;. <br />I always look for that kind of &#8220;explained&#8221; critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg_Brave</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg_Brave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, &lt;br&gt;Good post, and I understand your position, but I wanted to say something in favor of &quot;Munich&quot; guy - sometimes his position is also a good one. I mean that yes, its a digital camera and shooting hundred more pics doesn&#039;t cost a thing, but from artistic point of view - if you just point and shoot, then just don&#039;t shoot. We see so much photographic crap on the internet, why add more to it?&lt;br&gt;This is why I love so much &lt;a href=&quot;http://1x.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1x.com&lt;/a&gt; and don&#039;t like flickr. I also would like to give credit to that guy for one more thing - he didn&#039;t hesitate to critique you. Here, in the comments I didn&#039;t see a single negative comment. All of them are something like &quot;you are doing a wonderful job!!!&quot;. But how can you learn from such comments? It is much easier to say &quot;your photos are good, great, etc.&quot; and move on, than to say &quot;your photos are not good because this and that&quot;. &lt;br&gt;I always look for that kind of &quot;explained&quot; critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, <br />Good post, and I understand your position, but I wanted to say something in favor of &#8220;Munich&#8221; guy &#8211; sometimes his position is also a good one. I mean that yes, its a digital camera and shooting hundred more pics doesn&#39;t cost a thing, but from artistic point of view &#8211; if you just point and shoot, then just don&#39;t shoot. We see so much photographic crap on the internet, why add more to it?<br />This is why I love so much <a href="http://1x.com" rel="nofollow">1x.com</a> and don&#39;t like flickr. I also would like to give credit to that guy for one more thing &#8211; he didn&#39;t hesitate to critique you. Here, in the comments I didn&#39;t see a single negative comment. All of them are something like &#8220;you are doing a wonderful job!!!&#8221;. But how can you learn from such comments? It is much easier to say &#8220;your photos are good, great, etc.&#8221; and move on, than to say &#8220;your photos are not good because this and that&#8221;. <br />I always look for that kind of &#8220;explained&#8221; critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hangzhou Tour</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Hangzhou Tour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guilin Tour</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>Guilin Tour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>That Sounds interesting, I agree with you.Please keep at your good work, I would come back often.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Sounds interesting, I agree with you.Please keep at your good work, I would come back often.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True Religion Jeans</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>True Religion Jeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>It just depends on who is looking at it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just depends on who is looking at it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Lexington</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Lexington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Not really a disgusting item for an amateur. For remembrance purposes, this is okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really a disgusting item for an amateur. For remembrance purposes, this is okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Burke</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>David Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Great Story and the images are perfectly disgusting. I love them.  Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Story and the images are perfectly disgusting. I love them.  Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>Sounds like an awesome experience (for the most part) Mark...now I&#039;m jealous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like an awesome experience (for the most part) Mark&#8230;now I&#39;m jealous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>Wow....just wow....that is truly amazing. This post really moved me. To me, this is exactly what photography is about. Pictures that mean something to someone, no matter what camera, aperture, iso or whatever is used. It&#039;s even on my own homepage:&lt;br&gt;A photo is simple and complex at the same time: a fraction of a second to capture what words cannot. A snapshot can be as valuable as a work of art. It just depends on who is looking at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.just wow&#8230;.that is truly amazing. This post really moved me. To me, this is exactly what photography is about. Pictures that mean something to someone, no matter what camera, aperture, iso or whatever is used. It&#39;s even on my own homepage:<br />A photo is simple and complex at the same time: a fraction of a second to capture what words cannot. A snapshot can be as valuable as a work of art. It just depends on who is looking at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomethod</title>
		<link>http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>nomethod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snapfactory.com/?p=931#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>What a jerk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a jerk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
